# Consumer Optimization

Instructor: Joana Girante, Arizona State University

We live in a world of scarcity. In other words, what we want outweighs what we can attain. Why? Well, we have limited resources – money, options, time, etc. When

We live in a world of scarcity. In other words, what we want outweighs what we can attain. Why? Well, we have limited resources – money, options, time, etc. When you’re making choices about what to buy, your budget, the prices of goods and services, and your preferences all act as constraints.

To better illustrate this idea, let’s return to our simple example of pizzas and coffees. Let’s also assume that you like both pizza and coffee and want more of both. If you were to look at a map of your indifference curves for these goods, you’d see that you get the most utility on the indifference curve farthest from the origin. But, since scarcity is our reality, that level of utility is probably not achievable.

Combining your budget constraint with your indifference curves can help you see how to get maximum utility given your resources. Any point at which your budget constraint lies tangent to an indifference curve is an optimal combination of pizzas and coffees. Why is it optimal? Two simple reasons: 1) You can afford it, and 2) it will give you the most happiness (aka utility).

In this video, Arizona State University’s Professor Joana Girante will further explain the concept consumer optimization and how it applies to your everyday life. She’ll also cover why your points of consumer optimization will never intersect, but always lie tangent to, your indifference curves. Finally. Prof. Girante will go over marginal rates of substitution in more detail.

Options
Practice Questions

## Transcript

The way we make choices about what to buy depends on how our dreams, our wants, meet reality. We've covered thinking on the margin, budget constraints, and indifference curves. Now let's bring this all together to model how you decide what to purchase.

Remember, your budget constraint represents how the market values goods and what you can afford, given your income. Your indifference curves represent how you value goods based on your personal preferences. We all wish we could have more of everything. We would love to be way out here where we can consume as much as we want. But the reality is that we have limited resources and the prices of things force us to make tradeoffs. We want to get the best bang for our buck and that means finding that optimal combination of goods that brings together how the market values goods and our preferences. That's what this graph, illustrating your indifference curves and budget constraint, lets us better understand.

When you make a decision, you are effectively trying to be the happiest that you can, given the constraints that you face. You are, without knowing, solving a "constrained optimization" problem, where you are choosing problem, where you are choosing that maximize your utility given the prices of goods and your income.

Let's go back to our pizza and coffee example. You have a budget of \$50. Pizza costs \$10. And each cup of coffee costs \$5. Now, let's assume your indifference map looks like this. Making the best choice you can afford means you will spend your entire budget on the combination of pizzas and cups of coffee that make you the happiest. This means that your optimal consumption combination is on your budget line. Making the best choice you can afford also means that you will try to reach the indifference curve that represents the highest degree of satisfaction or utility. Because pizza and coffee are good things -- things that make you happy -- this will occur on the indifference curve that is the farthest away from the origin.

Why? Because the more pizza and coffee you have, the happier you are.

What keeps you from reaching this indifference curve? If you thought prices and income, you are right! Your budget constraint determines what you can afford. So your optimal consumption combination will be where your budget constraint is tangent to the highest indifference curve.

To see why, let's go back to thinking about to thinking about why you try to reach the indifference curve that is the farthest away from the origin. The best way to go about it is to look at a point where the budget line intersects one of your indifference curves. This particular combination of pizza and coffee -- it's affordable, because it's on your budget line. However, you are not the happiest you could be, now are you? Given your preferences, it's clear that you would be happier if you could buy this combination. It has more pizza, and just as many cups of coffee. But, hey, it's beyond your budget.

But now look at this. You are indifferent between this combination and this combination. Both are on the same indifference curve, and that means they provide you with the same utility. So, if you are trying to get the most utility you can, given what you can afford, you will never choose a combination of goods that intersects your budget constraint. You will choose one that is tangent to it. The point of tangency between the budget constraint and the indifference curve also means that at your optimal consumption combination, the market's relative price of the goods equals your willingness to substitute between them -- and that's your marginal rate of substitution.

Another way to see this is to recognize that at your best choice, the marginal utility per dollar of both goods is the same. Let's go back to thinking at the margin. At this point, would it make you happier to spend more money on pizza and less on coffee? Here, the marginal rate of substitution is 4, and that means you are willing to forego four cups of coffee to get one additional pizza. But pizza is only twice as expensive as coffee. So this is great news for you. The market is asking you to forego fewer cups of coffee than you are willing to. So you get that extra pizza.