Contributed Content (0)
Ask a Question
In the long-run, it doesn't seem like default seems to have any painful exclusions from capital markets. See this IMF Paper: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/wp08238.pdf
"This paper evaluates empirically four types of cost that may result from an international sovereign default: reputational costs, international trade exclusion costs, costs to the domestic economy through the financial system, and political costs to the authorities. It finds that the economic costs are generally significant but short-lived, and sometimes do not operate through conventional channels. The political consequences of a debt crisis, by contrast, seem to be particularly dire for incumbent governments and finance ministers, broadly in line with what happens in currency crises."
Argentina is a good example of a repeat-offender. This is particularly apt for a country like Italy which has bad politics, can default, and because it runs a primary surplus wouldn't need any further austerity.